Grand Hotel Sveti Vlas — press materialssvetivlas-owners.org/en

Press materials · For publication

Private apartment owners at the Grand Hotel Sveti Vlas

The collective voice of more than 120 owners from European Union countries, the USA and Israel who — according to their accounts — are being denied access to property they lawfully own in an EU member state.

Location Sveti Vlas, Burgas Province, Bulgaria Owners more than 120 Duration approx. 3 years Updated 7 August 2026

In brief

The case in numbers

120+
owners from EU countries, the USA and Israel
3years
how long the dispute has run
40€/m²
management fee — raised from €12
0
management contracts signed

Who the owners are

Private owners of apartments in the Grand Hotel complex in Sveti Vlas. The purchases were made lawfully — before a notary, through licensed agencies, from private sellers, at full market prices. Some financed the purchase with a mortgage; many invested further in renovation and furnishings.

The group numbers more than 120 people, from Poland and Germany among others, as well as the USA and Israel. Action is coordinated jointly and the case is pursued through a single law firm. This is the collective position of a group of owners, not one individual's account.

What the owners report

AreaReported practice
At purchaseRegistration at reception in a "book of private unit users", photographing of ID cards, and fees charged with no explanation of the basis and no receipt.
Management feesRate increases of €12 → €22 → €40/m². Refusal to disclose documents justifying the rates.
LiftsRefusal to issue access cards and instruction to use the stairs, despite apartments being on upper floors.
ElectricityPower cut off despite individual contracts with a separate supplier (EWN) and separate payment. The boxes supplying the units are on the building's floors, and hotel staff have access to them. Without electricity, only cold water remains in the apartment.
Common areasBan on using the pools, closure of the passage through the hotel grounds to the sea, no access to the panoramic lift despite co-ownership, municipal tax paid on common areas appropriated by the operator.
Unit nameplatesThe nameplates of more than 100 owners, distinguishing private apartments from hotel rooms, were removed and thrown away. The matter was reported to the Burgas–Nesebar prosecutor's office.
An open electrical box with circuit breakers on a hotel floor
A floor distribution box to which — according to the owners — hotel staff have access.
A police car parked under the hotel driveway
A police call-out at the hotel.

Examples of incidents

The situations below come from owners' accounts and are presented as they experienced them.

01An elderly resident who depends on a breathing device had her electricity cut off by reception — which had been told about her condition beforehand.
02An owner on crutches after knee surgery was refused entry; other owners had to bring him up in the lift so he could reach his own apartment.
03An owner was told to pay approximately €4,000 at the entrance. Having paid, he received a lift card but still cannot use the facilities. The police, when called, stated they would take no action.
Behind her stand the mafia, the Bulgarian government, the prosecutor's office and the courts.
A statement reported by the owners as the words of the hotel manager. Not the owners' position and not an established fact.

Legal situation

Ruling of the Nesebar CourtThe court annulled the resolutions of 2022 and 2024 introducing the management fee increases.
Property Management ActOwners staying less than three weeks a year are exempt from fees, while the hotel rents out rooms for approximately 150 days a year.
Funding of investmentsOwners in practice co-finance the hotel's investments — playgrounds, the pool, the facade — which they may not use.
Enforcement of the rulingDespite the judgment the operator does not comply with it, and enforcement has run for years. Local law firms refused to take the case.

Precedent

Co-owners at another Bulgarian complex — Hotel Tarsis — pursued years of litigation and regained access to and control over their property. It shows that the legal route, though long, can succeed. The owners at Sveti Vlas are taking the same orderly route. More: hoteltarsis.com

The case in the media

In December 2024 the Euro Asia News portal described the situation at the Grand Hotel Sveti Vlas, reporting that more than 120 owners from European countries, the USA and Israel had appealed to the European Parliament and to foreign ministries.

ItemSource
Article, December 2024euasia.news/2024/12/05/71281
Video reportyoutube.com/watch?v=2dl8zHDqk2U — Tomasz Sańpruch, Biuro Ekspansji Zagranicznej (in Polish)
Case websitesvetivlas-owners.org/en

These publications are linked as evidence of media interest. The views and wording they contain are their authors' position, not the owners'.

What the owners are asking for

Enforcement of final court rulings

Compliance with the Nesebar Court's judgment annulling the fee-increase resolutions, and effective enforcement.

Uninterrupted access to their property

Entry to their apartments, access to the lifts, and access to the common areas of which they are co-owners.

No interference with energy supply

An end to the cutting off of electricity in units covered by individual contracts with a supplier.

Transparency of fees

Disclosure of the documents justifying the management rates and an accounting of the sums collected.

Attention from European institutions

Consideration of the case as a matter of EU citizens' peaceful enjoyment of property in a member state.

Press contact

Languages
English, Polish, German, Russian, Bulgarian

On request from a newsroom we provide documentation for verification: notarial deeds, court rulings, correspondence with the operator and reports to the prosecutor's office. Interviews with owners can be arranged, including on an anonymous basis.

Disclaimer. This material is published in the public interest by a group of private owners. The events described are the owners' accounts and represent their experiences and position; they are not a finding of liability. Statements concerning court decisions rest on the rulings of the Nesebar Court. Matters reported to law enforcement remain pending. Newsrooms wishing to verify are invited to contact us — we will provide source documents.